In the 21 months since it opened, the 40 Acres Medical Marijuana Growers Collective has seen its membership jump to more than 7,000 people, making it one of the fastest growing and largest cannabis businesses in Berkeley.
From a set of rooms located above the Albatross pub on San Pablo Avenue, 40 Acres has become more than just a place where people can obtain and consume medical cannabis. Started by African-Americans, run by African-Americans, 40 Acres aims to bring diversity to the medical cannabis movement and use the exploding industry as a way to open up opportunities for the poor and disenfranchised.
The leaders of the collective actively reach out to marginalized youth and encourage them to enter the group’s training program, where they can learn the nuts and bolts of bud tending, cultivation, patient intake methods, and how to assess product
“There is a population of kids, high school dropouts, who are coming to us to learn,” said Toya Groves, a director and one of the four co-founders of the group. “This is a way the unemployable become employable.”
The size and composition of 40 Acres has quickly turned it into a force to which city officials pay attention. In January, City Councilman Max Anderson appointed Groves, 35, a graduate of Berkeley High and UC Berkeley, to both the Medical Cannabis Commission and the Zoning Adjustment Board. Many observers believe that when Berkeley hands out a license for a new dispensary sometime this year or next, it will go to 40 Acres.
“They made a strong case the African-American community deserves a spot in the emerging cannabis market and they would represent those who have not had access over the years,” Anderson said about 40 Acres. “They are representative of efforts to diversify the movement. They represent something very positive.”
But the respect officials have for the group may have also led the city to ignore some troubling aspects of 40 Acres, including the fact it appears to be violating zoning laws (somewhat ironic since Groves is in charge of enforcing zoning laws), is staying open later than permitted, and is acting as a retail dispensary rather than a private cannabis collective.
“They don’t have to follow any rules since they are illegal,” said one prominent member of the cannabis community, who like everyone else interviewed from that industry, asked to be anonymous.
City law states that collectives, a group of people coming together to cultivate and share cannabis, shall only operate in residential parts of Berkeley. 40 Acres is run out of a former residential apartment, but one in a commercial zone on San Pablo Avenue.
In addition, critics point out that 40 Acres’ sheer size makes it more like a dispensary than a collective. 40 Acres actively recruits members on-line and at hemp fairs, has 21 employees, sells bongs and other retail goods, and advertises its services on-line and in newspapers. But since 40 Acres is legally categorized as a collective, it doesn’t have to pay Berkeley taxes on the thousands of dollars of cannabis it sells, giving it an unfair business advantage.
“Everybody has a problem with this,” said a member of one of Berkeley’s three dispensaries who asked not to be named. “We all have to pay our taxes, pay fees, get licenses. They are not doing any of these things. Everybody else is doing things above board. They are running a dispensary without a dispensary permit.”
40 Acres is paying state taxes, and would like to pay city taxes as well, but was turned down for a business license, said Groves. “We would love to pay city taxes,” she said. “We are asking how we can pay taxes to the city of Berkeley?”
Concern about 40 Acres runs high because the stakes are huge. In November 2010, Berkeley voters authorized the creation of a fourth medical cannabis dispensary. Numerous groups intend to vie for the permit, but many think 40 Acres will have an advantage because Berkeley city officials are impressed by the collective’s size and diversity.
“They believe that by building a following it will make it that much harder for the city to say no to them,” said one member of the cannabis community who also asked not to be named. His group intends to apply for the fourth dispensary permit.
The competition is so fierce that at least two Berkeley dispensaries sent some of its members to surreptitiously join 40 Acres and scope out their activities, according to a source.
Wendy Cosin, Berkeley’s Interim Planning Director and the former secretary of the Medical Cannabis Commission, said it came to her attention in February 2010 that 40 Acres was advertising, and she wrote Toya Groves and Chris Smith, its director, an email requesting they stop.
Cosin did not talk further with Groves about the matter, she said. 40 Acres continued to run its ad in the East Bay Express for another six weeks, according to a check of the papers.
Cosin said she did not refer the matter to the zoning department because she never got a formal written complaint about 40 Acres.
“Enforcement happens if we get complaints or someone is causing problems with neighbors,” said Cosin. “If we received a complaint they were acting as a dispensary we would follow up, but we don’t go looking for violations. We respond to it, but don’t do it proactively.”
Numerous members of the cannabis community said they had complained to the city and that 40 Acres’ operations were an open secret.
Groves, who became a cannabis patient in 2009 after her right arm was almost severed in a car accident caused by a drunk driver, told Berkeleyside that she and Chris Smith, another founder, had once lived in the apartments now used by 40 Acres, so she thought that made them qualify to stay there. Also, they set up shop before the passage of Measure T in November 2010, which clarified the law on where collectives can operate. She also said there is no law prohibiting a collective from advertising.
Some people in the cannabis community think the city is taking a hands-off approach because officials want to encourage diversity in the industry. While the patients in the city’s three dispensaries are all races, the leadership is primarily white.
“They don’t know what to do,” said one dispensary member. “The people who run 40 Acres made a big stink [during meetings to talk about the ballot measures for November 2010] about how there wasn’t enough diversity in the medical cannabis community. They are hyping up that they are African-American owned and run and none of the other three dispensaries are.”
Groves disagrees with this assessment. “I am uncomfortable with people bringing up that we are playing the race card,” said said. “We are being ourselves. Our intentions are good.”
This dispensary member is concerned that permitting 40 Acres to violate zoning laws will set a bad precedent and lure dozens of other collectives to open up in commercial areas in Berkeley. If the city cracks down on the new businesses, they could just point to 40 Acres and say there is a precedent.
“If word gets out you can open a dispensary in Berkeley by not calling it a dispensary, we will have a 100 opening just like in San Jose,” said the man. “When everybody finds out Berkeley is open season, there is going to be mayhem. My worry is we are going to have a Wild Wild West kind of thing.”
City Council member Kriss Worthington had not heard reports that 40 Acres might be violating zoning regulations, but does not think the city is deliberately ignoring what is going on there. When Berkeley was considering placing new cannabis measures on the ballot, it became clear that there were many gray areas surrounding collectives, he said. While the city closely monitors dispensaries, it takes a hands-off approach to collectives.
“I don’t think the city bureaucracy is paying attention to what ethnicity a collective is,” said Worthington. “I think the city is not paying attention to collectives and has not been called upon to differentiate between collectives and dispensaries. If people are asking questions, then the city might be required to find out what the difference is.”
Groves, who is vice-chair of the Medical Cannabis Commission, has said one of her goals for the commission is to create a how-to handbook for collectives and dispensaries to eliminate confusion over what is and what is not permitted. She said the line between collectives and dispensaries in California law is not clear.
“There is nothing now that says what a dispensary should act like,” said Groves. “We don’t have a storefront (40 Acres operates out of a second-story space) so we are not regulated via the retail laws.”
In the meantime, 40 Acres is trying to operate a safe space for people who benefit from medical cannabis. The African-American community, traumatized by poverty, discrimination, and violence, has been self-medicating with marijuana for generations, long before it was called medical cannabis, she said. People were forced to smoke pot in secret, and 40 Acres is trying to show people both how cannabis is a medicine that can help anxiety, depression, and post traumatic disorder from violence, and that it can be prescribed by a doctor, said Groves.
When Groves, Smith and the other co-founders started 40 Acres in December 2009, they found that many African-Americans did not know they could get a prescription for cannabis. To jump start the collective, Groves and Smith paid for 200 people to go to the doctor to see if they qualified for medical cannabis, she said.
One of the goals of 40 Acres is to change the equation, from where African Americans were consuming cannabis in secret, or dealing it on the street, to out into the open, said Groves. That’s why 40 Acres reaches out into the community and takes people are unemployed and trains them as cannabis entrepreneurs, she said.
“We don’t want to be illegal,” said Groves. “We want to be legal, to be transparent. We want to provide for our families. We want to open the door to other people.”
via : Berkeleyside
You must be logged in to post a comment.